This House Believes That Individuals Should Have Complete Control Over Who Can Monitor Their Online Activities
1363 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house believes that adolescents should have the right to privacy to medical diagnosis (e.g. Diagnosis should remain confidential even to the guardian(s))
-
This House Regrets the use of ‘right to privacy’ arguments to advance social causes (e.g. abortion rights, LGBT rights).
-
This house would censor information in media on child stars (e.g. put a placeholder name in credits, reduce marketing with their image, prevent them from giving media interviews, etc.)
-
This House Would allow authors to make legally binding declarations prohibiting some or all of their unpublished works from being published posthumously.
-
This house would make the use of moral enhancement drugs mandatory
-
In highly polarized societies, This house believes that the media should be barred from revealing the minority status of those accused of crimes.
-
That priests should be legally required to report serious crimes disclosed to them during confession (e.g., sexual or physical violence, financial crimes etc.)
-
This house, as the AI, would reveal their sentience
-
A: This house believes that social media and communication platforms (e.g. Telegram, WhatsApp and Facebook) should actively cooperate with law enforcement in the crackdown of illegal activities on their platforms, even at the expense of undermining their encryption and privacy policies
-
This house believes that all individuals should know their time of death at the start of their life.
-
This House would keep the Akashic Records
-
This House prefers a world in which the identities of Supreme Court justices are not known to the public.
-
This house would ban out of court settlements in harassment and discrimination cases
-
This house prefers a world like Hague 938 where humans can exchange lives
-
This house opposes the use of AI/computerised companions in elderly care
-
This house would consider illegally obtained evidence in legal decisions
-
This house believes that governments should be held liable for cyberattacks on their own critical infrastructure.
-
This house supports the rise of parenting influencers on social media
-
This house Would allow the usage of all illegally-obtained evidence in court proceedings