This house opposes the 'sexscraper' plan
494 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house supports developing countries adopting economic policies that discourages urbanisation
-
This house believes that development projects (ie: expressways, airports, city-wide private development) should be approved by a referendum.
-
This house supports the use of “eye in the sky” policing in urban areas with high crime rates
-
This house would build social housing in wealthy neighborhoods
-
This house would offer financial subsidies to individuals to move out of Paris
-
This house would reform single family house holdings to communal houses in urban cities.
-
This house believes that developing countries should adopt economic development policies that heavily incentivise urbanisation
-
This house would heavily tax newer residents of megacities
-
This house would provide significant financial incentives for urban citizens to move to rural areas
-
This house would pay individuals to migrate from highly populated cities to rural areas
-
This house believes that that major cities should adopt the Amsterdam rental model.
-
That the Minister's decision will do more harm than good
-
That governments in developing countries should limit migration into large established cities.
-
This house as a first-generation minority immigrant, W raise their kid in an ethnic enclave
-
That we should build social housing* in wealthy neighbourhoods. *housing that is owned or heaviliy subsidized by the government and which is rented out at low prices.
-
That we should ban Airbnb.
-
That urban planners should ignore 'Established Neighbourhood Character' when making housing and land use decisions
-
This house believes that urban planners should prioritize Established Neighbourhood Character when guiding future development and land use decisions
-
This house prefers centralised urban planning system to decentralised urban planning system