This house opposes the medicalization of gender dysphoria among the queer community
2279 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house opposes the portrayal of abortion as 'without consequence' within feminist spaces
-
This house prefers a world where all major religions did not obligate their followers to go on religious pilgrimages
-
This house believes that the medical community (e.g. healthcare professionals, institutions, researchers) should heavily invest in AI-based mental health services (e.g. therapy)
-
This house would significantly subsidize medical treatments which extend female fertility
-
This house would all pharmaceutical companies to advertise prescription medication
-
This house would make Ibong Adarna publicly accessible
-
This house believes that medical professionals should be able to opt out of providing treatment on religious or ethical grounds
-
That governments should buy out failing private hospitals
-
That we support General Practitioners being allowed to diagnose and prescribe medication for ADHD
-
That we should adopt a progressive user-pays system for all government services that increase the average user's lifetime earning potential (e.g. early intervention disability supports, drug and alcohol rehabilitation, Youth Allowance)
-
That Australia should heavily subsidise local pharmaceutical manufacturing
-
That we support a rise in microinsurance
-
This house would allow commercial surrogacy
-
This house would reduce the number of matches in a calendar year in European Football
-
This house opposes the shift of body-positive public figures (e.g., Meghan Trainor, Lizzo, Rebel Wilson) toward advocating for weight loss under the banner of health
-
This house, as trans rights advocates in the academe, prefer to emphasize the similarities between trans and cis people (e.g., shared bodily functions, emotional experiences, and general healthcare needs) over emphasizing biological or neurological differences (e.g., distinct brain structures, effects of hormone therapy, or unique experiences of dysphoria) in their academic and advocacy work
-
This house, as trans rights advocates in the academe, prefer to emphasize the similarities between trans and cis people (e.g., shared bodily functions, emotional experiences, and general healthcare needs) over emphasizing biological or neurological differences (e.g., distinct brain structures, effects of hormone therapy, or unique experiences of dysphoria) in their academic and advocacy work
-
This house regrets the general philosophy of viewing most organisms traditionally classified as parasites as pathogens rather than endosymbionts.
-
This house believes that states should invest in dendritic cell vaccine research over expanding traditional cancer chemotherapies (i.e. use of classic cytotoxic agents that indiscriminately target all rapidly dividing cells).