You are an author who is trying to warn against climate change. Rather than write a dystopian sci-fi novel on the aftermath of climate change this house would write a similar fantasy novel (magic brooms instead of hovercrafts spells instead of laser guns etc) where using magic slowly but irreversibly harms the Earth.
1826 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house believes that, developing countries with high rare earth mineral reserves, should set up their own state-owned enterprises rather than rely on multinational corporations to extract them
-
This house supports non-violent property damage (e.g. blowing up pipelines, sabotaging logging equipment etc.) in order to stop climate change
-
This house would lift patents on technologies designed to deal with environmental concerns
-
Assuming anatomic feasibility, this house, as John Cena in his 2nd term as US President, W release a chemical which caused all animals, and their offspring, (excluding humans) to grow to random sizes, between a mouse and a double-decker bus
-
This house would ban aquariums
-
This house believes that Cows are the silent jury in the trial of mankind
-
This house would invade Colombia to stop the Cocaine Hippos
-
This house would focus on adapting to the consequences of climate change rather than trying to prevent it
-
This house believes that developed economies should halt or reverse economic growth as a solution to climate change.
-
This house believes that waterways (The Nile River, Amazon River) spanning several countries should be governed by an independent international body
-
As environmental activists this house would prioritize lobbying the government to create environmentally friendly policies (e.g. Cap and Trade banning environmentally harmful chemicals) rather than campaigning individuals to take responsibility for environmental change and change their lifestyle (e.g. reducing/recycling waste taking public transportation).
-
This house believes that the change in the demographic of leaders has done the environmental movement more harm than good
-
This house believes that the culture of consumption (consumerism) does more harm than good (consumption)
-
This house would decline to regulate firms using traditional anti-monopoly policies (e.g., breaking up firms, preventing mergers and acquisitions, etc.) and instead mandate that companies meet a threshhold of public good (including but not limited to environmental and/or social activism, providing infrastructure to underprivileged communities, establishing scholarship or educational funds, etc.) proportionate to their size.
-
This house, as a union representing workers in the mining sector, would publicly call for climate action.
-
This house regrets the dominant belief of anthropocentrism.
-
This house believes that environmental movements should support climate engineering* that fundamentally alters the environment in an attempt to combat global warming
-
This house prefers a human gatherer society over an agriculture one
-
This house believes that multinational corporations operating in developing nations should be compelled to follow the strict environmental standards of western liberal democracies