This house believes that the environmental movement should employ strategies that aim to abolish capitalism rather than to reform it.
1826 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house believes that the environmental movement should embrace the inevitability of climate change and focus on surviving instead.
-
This house would suspend all regulation regarding environmental protection laws and policies during prolonged periods of economic recession
-
This house believes that, rather than protecting endangered species the animal rights movement should prioritize maximizing the total welfare of the animal population
-
This house believes that the environmental movement ought to publicly support anti-natalist groups.
-
This house believes that scientists should not bring dinosaurs back to life
-
This house would tax CO2 emissions by companies and pay every citizen an equal share of the collected money
-
This house will ban the use of personal vehicles in densely populated areas / areas with developed public transport.
-
This house regrets the rise of electric vehicles
-
Countries submit their Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) which discloses their national climate action plans. Examples of these plans include aiming for carbon neutral or net zero emissions adding capacity on renewable energy and fulfilling obligations under the Paris Agreement. In the present while countries are legally required to establish their NDCs achievement of the NDCs is non-binding. This house as the United Nations would make all NDCs legally binding
-
This house would remove all patents on green technology
-
This house believes that the ICC should prosecute ecocide.
-
This house would remove patents and intellectual property rights on technological goods and processes which do not reach a 'reasonable sustainability standard'.
-
This house believes that European Parliament should approve the Green Revolution proposal
-
This house believes that environmental movements should heavily shift their conservation efforts to the protection of keystone species even at the expense of other endangered species
-
As Tom this house would fabricate the test result as a failure
-
This house believes that conservationists should prioritise the development of de-extinction technologies over conserving existing species
-
As a developing country government with a high economic dependence on the agricultural and livestock sectors, this Council will require livestock & agriculture industry players to openly list the levels of antibiotic residues and the risks in each of their products.
-
This house prefers environmental movements heavily prioritizing a local agenda over a global one (e.g. focusing on local pollution rather than climate change)
-
This house believes that protests like blood money do more harm than good to the environmental movement