This house prefers sectoral bargaining to enterprise bargaining
2051 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house would prioritize economic subsidies for small businesses over large corporations.
-
This house would rather be Mario than Luigi
-
This house prefers households with one working parent and one stay-at-home parent, to households with two working parents
-
This house opposes the "up or out" system
-
This house would allow unions to strike for economic interests of workers in other workplaces (aka 'solidarity strikes')
-
As a promising Indian university level basketball player, This house would accept an international basketball offer over a govt job.
-
This House, as parents, Would teach their children to aspire for a dream job as the primary goal of their lives
-
This house would allow individual workers to waive their labour rights for additional pay.
-
This house believes that the United States should heavily redistribute wealth* *e.g. significantly increasing taxes on the rich, increasing welfare and public services spending, raising the minimum wage
-
This house would allow companies to have clauses in their employment contracts that prohibit women from having children while they are bound by the contract
-
This house would heavily ease labour regulations in times of economic crisis (e.g. heavily reducing/removing the minimum wage, relaxing safety laws, etc.)
-
This house regrets the norm of traditionally feminine professions being considered high empathy careers (e.g. nursing, teaching)
-
This house believes that contemporary social movements should focus on class differences rather than on identity-based differences (gender, race, religion etc.)
-
Tanel needs to talk to Kristjan about the layoff.
-
This house would Link Teachers' Salaries to the Performance of Their Students
-
This house would Ban Workers in Essential Sectors From Striking
-
During times of crisis, financial assistance from the government, does more harm than good.
-
This house would allow doctors to strike.
-
That unions should not involve themselves or take stances on political and social issues that are not directly relevant to the industry they represent