This House Supports the widespread implementation of predictive AI models in the criminal justice system (e.g., sentencing, forecasting case outcomes, assessing culpability, replacing juries).
-
-
This house, as humanity, would embrace a coexistence with the SAKRI
-
This house supports the rise in use of LLMs for psychological needs (e.g. venting, therapy, friendship etc...)
-
This house supports the rise in use of LLMs for psychological needs (e.g. venting, therapy, friendship etc...)
-
This house, as the lawyer, prefers the world where your job was one of the automated jobs
-
This house supports a widespread adoption of the Liverpool model among sports teams
-
This house supports the use of AI in mental health services (examples include but are not limited to: seeking companionship from Chatbots, requesting personalized treatment recommendations etc.).
-
That we believe artificial intelligence will do more harm than good to the average person
-
This house would establish an AGI-governed global authority with absolute power to set and enforce digital policies (e.g., content moderation, data protection, cybersecurity).
-
This house believes that Sam Altman is going to heaven
-
This House believes that the rapid rise of competition in AI has done more harm than good
-
That we prefer open academic AI research over corporate-led development
-
This House Supports the EU heavily deregulating advanced tech sectores (e.g. AI, cloud computing, etc)
-
This House Supports the increase rise of AI doomerism* *viewing AI as an existential threat to humanity
-
This house prefers a world in which the pursuit of AGI is abandoned
-
This house supports a significant robot tax
-
This house predicts that China’s AI strategy will be more successful than the US’s by 2050
-
This House would have the AI run their life.
-
This House supports the existence of a technology that allows people to see, retrospectively, the effects on their lives if they made major life decisions differently.
-
This House would have the AI run their life.