This house believes that government should prioritize environmental sustainability over economic development.
1826 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house would transfer complete management of environmentally significant areas to an international body, instead of the national government of that area (e.g., control of the Mabira Rainforest or Lake Victoria would be transferred to an international body, instead of being under the control of the Ugandan government)
-
This house supports the use of market-based solutions to climate change
-
This house believes that the Bangladesh Government should prioritize shifting to cleaner energy sources over meeting the current energy demand with fossil fuel.
-
The environmental movements under the ECCQ should employ tactics that disrupt the regular activities of ordinary citizens.
-
This house believes that the countries of the Lithium Triangle should form a consortium for the exploitation of the minerals. *Consortium: It is a group of countries that jointly control the production and distribution of a raw material.
-
This house believes that Bhutan's efforts towards launching green cryptocurrency mining will do more harm than good.
-
This house, as a prominent sustainability-focused hedge fund, W pursue an aggressive short-selling strategy against carbon-intensive stocks (for example, fossil fuels/energy companies etc.).
-
This house supports widespread adoption of debt-for-nature swaps in financially distressed developing countries.
-
This house supports efforts to lower carbon emissions even if it comes at the expense of biodiversity (e.g. building hydroelectric dams in natural reserves, planting trees that kill biodiversity)
-
This house believes that Taliban should decommission the Kamal Khan Dam.
-
This house opposes Olive finance.
-
THW ban zoos
-
This house would prohibit fossil fuel companies from heavily investing into green and renewable energy companies
-
This house would ban cobalt mining in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
-
This house believes that environmental movements should prioritize funding climate litigation
-
This house, as a developing country, would aggressively attempt to implement "Parle G".
-
This house believes that developing countries should adopt economic development policies that heavily disincentivise urbanisation
-
This house believes that governments should aggressively prioritise encouraging commuters to use public transport (e.g. through infrastructural improvements, tax incentives) over subsidising the uptake of electric cars.
-
This house believes that the GERD will do more harm than good.