This house, as FIDE, would abolish gender-specific chess titles
12692 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house prefers a world where the responsibility of child-rearing is deputized by the state to communities instead of families
-
That, assuming feasibility, we support a tax on all unsolicited communications.
-
That we would allocate LULUs by using the tender process.
-
That we oppose university rankings (e.g., QS, Times Higher Education)
-
That it is in the interests of the CCP to substantially liberalise its position on Queer rights.
-
That we prefer schools to adopt a primarily academic educational philosophy rather than a holistic one.
-
That we prefer a world where the Clinton Administration fully implemented the recommendations of the 1995 U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform
-
That states with low fertility rates should implement the Hanson Proposal.
-
That we prefer the 'Help to Buy' scheme to the 'Super for Housing' scheme.
-
That we support the use of analogue listing rather than individual listing when prohibiting NPS.
-
(B) This house believes that parents should disclose their financial hardship to their children
-
(A) In areas with relatively high crime rates, This house supports the implementation of Hugs, Not Bullets
-
(A) This house regrets the dominance of the nuclear family as the traditional model of parenting
-
(B) This house believes that forgiveness by the victim should not serve as grounds for reducing a criminal's sentence
-
(A) This house supports the São Paulo governor's plan to use artificial intelligence (AI) in creating classroom content for public schools
-
(B) In fragile democracies, This house would ban the formation of youth wings of political parties
-
(B) In developing countries with low educational outcomes, This house would privately outsource educational institutions (e.g. schools)
-
(B) This house would allow individuals to sue other individuals on the basis of religious indoctrination
-
(C) This house prefers a world where universities collect a portion of their income upon graduation instead of charging tuition fees to students upfront