That we should ban ultra-fast fashion
1826 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
That, where species are endangered, that we prefer a system of rotational zoning to a system of permanent no-take zones
-
This house believes that the environmental movement should abandon the narrative of personal responsibility (e.g encouraging recycling, buying green products) in favour of one which emphasises institutional accountability (e.g. calling for taxation and regulation)
-
This house would forcefully break up megacities in developing nations
-
This house would prosecute business leaders for environmental crimes committed by their companies.
-
In countries most affected by climate change, This house would make the provision of farming subsidies contingent on the adoption of Green farming practices.
-
This House would press the Gore button.
-
This House prefers British Parliamentary to 3v3.
-
This house supports the creation of autonomously governed ocean-based communities (ie. seasteading)
-
This house believes that the environment movement should adopt modern anthropocentrism over ecocentrism
-
C. This house believes that the green energy activists should aggressively advocate for nuclear energy over other renewable energy sources.
-
This house would loosen anti-trust regulation for mergers concerning companies that heavily invest in sustainability
-
This house supports the commercialisation of deep ocean expeditions.
-
A. This house believes that popular media should emphasize the progress made in combatting climate change over publishing negative and disastrous impacts of climate change.
-
B. This house supports environmental movements that adopt disruptive mass participation actions as a core strategy.
-
This house supports making loans to developing countries conditional on significant environmental reforms
-
This house opposes green belt policies
-
This house believes that it is in the interests of Greenland to substantially increase relations with China
-
This house would lift patents on technologies designed to deal with climate change (green technology in manufacturing processes, carbon capture, critical warning and risk analysis technologies, etc)
-
This house believes that environmental movements should welcome and prioritise claims (such as the one from the evangelical environment Network) suggesting that it is a religious or moral duty to act against Climate change.