This house believes that the state should bear all costs of elective sex reassignment surgery
1054 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house believes that youth-based political parties in developing countries should include the fight for queer rights in its manifesto
-
This house regrets the emphasis on sex and sexual acts in the LGBTQIA+ community
-
This house would out the poitician
-
This house believes that progressive social movements in India (e.g. feminist or LGBTQ+ movement) should strongly distance themselves from the West (e.g by not accepting funding, not exchanging information, or heavily emphasising their cultural specifity)
-
This house, as Ariana Grande upon being offered to headline at the event, will completely boycott Coachella and turn the offer down.
-
As LGBTQIA+ community in conservative areas, this house would discourage our opened identity member from having relationship with closeted individuals
-
This house regrets the commercialization of social movement by corporate (e.g: rainbow capitalism)
-
This house would Prefer To Live In A World Where Everyone Is Born With A Fluid Sexuality
-
This house, as a parent, would actively avoid gender markers when raising young children (e.g. dressing children in pink or blue, encouraging girls to play with dolls and boys to play with toy trucks)
-
This house believes that LGBTQ+ characters in pop culture and films should only be played by LGBTQ+ actors
-
This house believes that it is the duty of parents to raise their children free of gender roles
-
This house would provide significance tax benefits to publicly listed STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) companies whose top executives are at least 60% non-cisgender men.
-
This house as the LGBTQ+ movement regrets pink capitalism
-
This house, as prominent TERFs, would publicly support and financially donate to freedom of gender expression causes that do not contradict with our core belief (donating to cross-dress fashion labels, norm of asking prefered gender pronoun, etc)
-
Assuming conservatives would accept the RUU-PKS bill afterwards, this house believes that progressives should agree to explicitly draft the exclusion of sexual minorities from the scope of the law.
-
This house believes that the state should not enforce anti-discrimination laws to discriminative acts applied by religious institutions to their own members (i.e. refusing to provide sermons for gay marriage even when the state acknowledges marriage equality, etc.)
-
Presuming that the technology existed to alter people's sexual orientation this house would subsidize that technology under the national healthcare service
-
This house believes that individuals with same-sex attraction who are open about their sexual orientaton should be reluctant to date closeted individuals
-
This house regrets the prominence of declaring one's sexual orientation (EG national coming out Day) as a tactic for acceptance by the LGBT community