This house, as the LGBTQIA+ community, supports queer coding in art
1054 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house believes that LGBT-themed reality TV shows (e.g. Rupaul's Drag Race Queer Eye) have done more harm than good to the LGBT movement
-
This house believes that IN WESTERN LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES, NON CIS MALES SHOULD NOT USE CONVENTIONAL GENDER ROLES (E.G. MARKETING ONESELF AS A MOTHER OR WIFE) AS A TACTIC IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGN
-
This house believes that the lgbtqia+ community should actively de-glamorise coming out
-
This house supports the further rise of conservatism in mainstream LGBTQIA+ discourse
-
This house believes that the LGBTQIA+ community should celebrate the rise of the amateur porn scene (e.g. OnlyFans, etc.)
-
This house welcomes Caitlyn Jenner's gubernatorial candidacy for California
-
This house believes that drag should not be mainstream
-
In highly conservative states, this house would mandate the inclusion of gender sensitivity courses in the curriculum of higher educational institutions
-
This house regrets the narrative within the LGBT community that individuals have an obligation to come out.
-
This house regrets the romanticisation of such movies
-
That we regret the emphasis on tragic romantic stories in queer narratives (as seen in cinema literature television etc.)
-
This house would never start a relationship with someone who didn't want to come out.
-
That as Pope Francis we would immediately announce significant doctrinal liberalisation (e.g. blessings for same sex marriage opening the priesthood to women)
-
That we believe the transgender community should heavily prioritise rights-based messages in its advocacy (i.e. fighting for specific rights and protections for trans individuals) over identity-based messages (i.e. that trans and non-binary identities are valid)
-
This house regrets the use of '"Queer Coding"' in LGBTQI + representation in the media
-
This house believes that it is the duty of the LGBT community to adopt a '"gaysplaining"' stance instead of a combative stance with heterosexual individuals in the face of potentially homophobic attitudes
-
This house would join Stonewall
-
This house believes that the use of acronyms to refer to non-cis-heteronormative individuals (eg, LGBTQIA +) should be replaced by the single term '"queer"".
-
This house regrets the fictional creation of LGBT couples among celebrities who have never taken on this relationship