This house, as the progressive glacier movement, would campaign for glaciers to voluntarily acquiesce to global warming.
-
-
This House would impose lighter carbon emissions targets on developing countries
-
This house believes that environmental movements should support climate engineering that fundamentally alters the environment, in an attempt to combat Global Warming
-
This house opposes a narrative that climate change has gone past a 'point of no return'
-
This house would approve of using wartime emergency powers to fight climate change.
-
This House Supports the usage of citizen's assemblies to determine policies addressing climate change
-
This house opposes the implementation of ecological migration.
-
That it should be illegal to publicly deny climate change
-
That, where species are endangered, that we prefer a system of rotational zoning to a system of permanent no-take zones
-
That we should ban ultra-fast fashion
-
This house believes that the environmental movement should abandon the narrative of personal responsibility (e.g encouraging recycling, buying green products) in favour of one which emphasises institutional accountability (e.g. calling for taxation and regulation)
-
In countries most affected by climate change, This house would make the provision of farming subsidies contingent on the adoption of Green farming practices.
-
This house believes that the environment movement should adopt modern anthropocentrism over ecocentrism
-
This house would loosen anti-trust regulation for mergers concerning companies that heavily invest in sustainability
-
A. This house believes that popular media should emphasize the progress made in combatting climate change over publishing negative and disastrous impacts of climate change.
-
This house supports making loans to developing countries conditional on significant environmental reforms
-
Assuming the technology exists, this house supports genetic engineering to make humans more resistant to the effects of climate change (e.g. birthing smaller and less resource-intensive children, making children more tolerant to extreme temperatures).
-
This house, as the environmental movement would shift focus to investor activism over political activism to increase regulations.
-
This house would lift patents on technologies designed to deal with climate change (green technology in manufacturing processes, carbon capture, critical warning and risk analysis technologies, etc)
-
This house believes that environmental movements should welcome and prioritise claims (such as the one from the evangelical environment Network) suggesting that it is a religious or moral duty to act against Climate change.