This house, as European fur suppliers, would pivot to faux fur instead of investing in more sustainable fur sourcing.
1826 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This House, as the environmentalist movement, Would focus on advocating their interests through separate political parties (‘Green Parties’) rather than lobbying mainstream political parties to adopt more pro-environment policies
-
We prioritize a world where recurring sporting events (e.g., the Olympics, World Cup) have fixed locations for competition rather than being decided through bidding processes.
-
This house supports the rise of for-profit organizations in the environmental movement.
-
This house would require coastal residences, e.g. ammenities, resorts, and villages, to pay environmental tax dedicated to marine/reef restoration.
-
This House opposes the public expectations of continuous economic growth
-
This house believes that the environmentalist movement should primarily focus on religious-based advocacy (e.g. using religious narratives) as opposed to secular-based advocacy (e.g. using data and scientific fact)
-
"This house, as environmentalist groups, would primarily abandon advocating for the mitigation of climate change (carbon taxes, carbon offsetting, planting trees), in favour of campaigning for adaptation efforts instead (e.g. building sea walls, exploring alternative living habitats)
-
This house believes that it is more likely the world will be in a worse condition than it currently is within 50 years.
-
This house, as the Liberal Party of Canada, R the carbon tax
-
The parliament will prohibit all forms of livelihood extraction and entry for the purpose of tourism in the Sundarbans to preserve biodiversity and environmental balance.
-
This house would remove all patents on green technology
-
This house would force countries that are major polluters to accept environmental refugees
-
This House as the European Union would abandon the European Green New Deal
-
This house supports the creation of international body for the extraction of rare earth elements.
-
This house believes that it is in the interest of resource-rich nations (e.g. Serbia, Mexico and Argentina) to allow Western corporations to undertake mining operations for the extraction of 'green minerals' (e.g. Lithium, Zinc, Nickel) that are essential for green technology.
-
This House Believes That humanity should focus on adapting to the consequences of climate change (e.g. building seawall, upgrading infrastructure, disaster management) rather than trying to restore Earth to its pre-industrial era state (e.g. carbon sequestration, clean energy & efficiency, and sustainable transportation).
-
This House Regrets Laos construction of its Mekong dams.
-
This House Believes That first-world countries should payout reparations to third-world countries for climate change.
-
This house, as environmental movements, would preach the concept of karma in environmental campaigns.