This house believes that major tourist destinations should significantly limit the number of tourists that can visit
1826 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This house prefers a world where all environmental policies are decided through a planetary parliament
-
This house prefers a world where these sandworms exist and are furthurmore the only source of oil and other fossil fuels
-
This House Supports the Widespread Replacement of Conventional Burial Methods (E.g Embalment, Caskets, Etc) with Mass Burials
-
This house believes that environmental movements should heaviliy prioritize climate litigation as an advocacy strategy
-
This house predicts the rise of ecofascism in the West as a major force within the 21st century
-
This house supports the narrative of minimal consumerism as a means to reduce carbon footprint
-
This house opposes the narrative that human progress is always good
-
This House Believes that pro-environmental organisations that use 'non-violent civil resistance' tactics (e.g. blocking public roads, spray painting private property, disrupting prominent cultural sites etc.) do more harm than good to the environmental movement
-
This house believes that environmental activists should abandon the narrative of ‘individual environmental responsibility’.
-
This house believes that governments should strongly prioritise combating climate change over economic growth
-
That we would implement a personal emissions trading scheme
-
That we support the significant expansion of nuclear energy generation
-
This house believes that developing nations should prioritise their economic development over addressing and resolving the cause and effects of climate change.
-
This House supports India's emissions-trading scheme
-
This house opposes Space Tourism
-
This house believes that developed countries should pursue degrowth.
-
This house, as a prominent sustainability-focused hedge fund, W pursue an aggressive short-selling strategy against carbon-intensive stocks (for example, fossil fuels/energy companies etc.).
-
This house believes that developed countries should pay developing countries to protect ecologically important land and/or waters from economic exploitation (e.g. deforestation mining fishing)
-
This house would grant legal personhood and representation for significant environmental reserves (e.g., Amazon Rain Forest, Nile River, Tubbataha Reef, etc.).