For health care emergencies requiring collective action (e.g. pandemics, pollution-related illness, etc.), This house would grant the WHO the ability to implement international laws that override sovereign laws
1826 motions
Data missing or incorrect? Contribute!-
-
This House would give the youth a veto on economic policy that may affect the environment
-
This house supports the Fire Camp program
-
This house believes that North American cities with declining populations should embrace a policy of "de-growth" (e.g. repurposing unused infrastructure for other uses, converting unused parking lots to parks) rather than trying to encourage growth (e.g. offering tax breaks to businesses that move to the city)
-
This house would abolish the EU Common Agricultural Policy.
-
This house regrets the invitation to Taliban representatives to attend the UN Climate Convention
-
This house prefers the use of emotional rhetoric as compared to dispassionate objectivity as a strategy to advocate for environmental issues.
-
This house believes that corporations' focus on ESG has done more harm than good to the environment.
-
This house prefers a world where the PNRI was mandated to heavily prioritize Nuclear Energy Development
-
This House as the environmental movement would support the use of extremist tactics
-
This house supports the development of genetic engineering
-
This house, as the environmental movement, supports the Trump administration’s push to increase tariffs against Chinese goods
-
The parliament (of Bangladesh) will impose higher taxes on industries destructive to life and nature (such as the shipbreaking industry and others) compared to the existing tax system.
-
This parliament (a Western right-wing political party) will glorify 'eco-fascism' instead of the conventional right-wing environmental political position.
-
This house believes that the commercialization of thrifting has done more harm than good
-
This House Prefers the citizen welfare standard to the consumer welfare standard
-
C. This house believes that indigenous communities should have veto power over development projects affecting their environment.
-
A. This house, as the environmental movement, would refuse funding from companies engaged in greenwashing.
-
C. This house believes that indigenous communities should have veto power over development projects affecting their environment.
-
B. This house believes that governments should allocate foreign aid based on environmental protection rather than political alliances or historical ties.