That we should use predictive data to assess the age at which individuals should qualify for retirement pension payments rather than a standardised retirement age.
-
-
This house regrets the widespread narrative that living a long life is inherently good
-
This house would make the weight of votes proportionate to a person’s expected remaining lifespan.
-
This house would take away the driving license of the elderly
-
That we regret narratives of deference to the elderly (e.g. 'older people are more experienced").
-
This house regrets Filial Piety
-
This house believes that the feminist movement should oppose anti-aging products
-
This house would implement filial responsibility laws
-
This house believes that states with aging populations should accept more immigrants instead of providing incentives for their citizens to have more children.
-
That we should use predictive data to assess the age at which individuals should qualify for retirement pension payments rather than a standardised retirement age.
-
This house would mandate retirement from Congress at age 65.
-
This house would mandate retirement from Congress at age 65
-
This house regrets narratives that glorify the elderly (e.g. “The old know better”; “The old deserve more” etc.)
-
This house believes that the discovery of a means to stop the human aging process would be a curse to humanity.
-
This house regrets the stigmatization of outsourcing eldercare* in Asian societies.
-
This house would celebrate sending one’s parents to homes for the aged(old folks homes).
-
In a super-aging society this house would give more votes to the young
-
This house regrets giving special moral authority to the elders (the elders know better the elders are right)
-
This house would make voting power depreciate with age.
-
This house would Require adult children to take care of their parents